# Available forcing data

**URL:** <https://forum.access-hive.org.au/t/available-forcing-data/5772>\
**Category:** Land Surface\
**Tags:** help, jules, cable\
**Created:** [12 January 2026 05:09 UTC](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/t/available-forcing-data/5772 "2026-01-12T05:09:11Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 5\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![aukkola](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.access-hive.org.au/aukkola/32/202_2.png) [@aukkola](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/u/aukkola)\
**Post date:** [12 January 2026 05:09 UTC](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/t/available-forcing-data/5772/1 "2026-01-12T05:09:11Z")

</div>

Hello,  
I was hoping to check if we now have shared forcing datasets for CABLE/JULES and/or the capacity to create these at sub-daily time scales from data available on Gadi?

Thanks,

Anna

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![clairecarouge](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.access-hive.org.au/clairecarouge/32/380_2.png) [@clairecarouge](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/u/clairecarouge)\
**Post date:** [12 January 2026 22:33 UTC](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/t/available-forcing-data/5772/2 "2026-01-12T22:33:30Z")

</div>

Hello Anna,

the short answer is not yet.

Longer answer is we are working on both a met forcing pre-processor and an ancillary suite. The use of the ancillary suite has focused on AM3 for now as there is a need for the high-resolution ACCESS. This is very close to a working version. @lachlanswhyborn is looking for [input on the mapping of CCI to CABLE’s PFTs](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/t/cci-land-cover-and-associated-ancillary-suite/5507/18).

For the meterological forcings, @abhaasgoyal has started working on it again in November or about. He has [a prototype for ERA5](https://github.com/ACCESS-Community-Hub/Land-ancillary-creation/pull/17) but it is very slow currently. He is working on clean up, documentation and tests in a first instance. We’ll work on the speed up afterwards and then on supporting more datasets.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![clairecarouge](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.access-hive.org.au/clairecarouge/32/380_2.png) [@clairecarouge](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/u/clairecarouge)\
**Post date:** [12 January 2026 22:35 UTC](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/t/available-forcing-data/5772/3 "2026-01-12T22:35:25Z")

</div>



---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![aukkola](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.access-hive.org.au/aukkola/32/202_2.png) [@aukkola](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/u/aukkola)\
**Post date:** [20 January 2026 22:50 UTC](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/t/available-forcing-data/5772/4 "2026-01-20T22:50:06Z")

</div>

Ok great. Partly asking as there is some interest from the DAVE group to use sub-daily data. We have a version of AGCD but it only goes to ~2020 as we don’t have access to BoM radiation data beyond then.

I’m still also clueless about anything science related (😅) and can’t for the life of me remember if we need to bias-correct reanalysis data like ERA5 or BARRA to use it to force CABLE/JULES? Or can we use the raw data? @siyuan wondering what you’ve done with JULES?

Thanks,

Anna

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![siyuan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/d78d45/32.png) [@siyuan](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/u/siyuan)\
**Post date:** [21 January 2026 00:10 UTC](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/t/available-forcing-data/5772/5 "2026-01-21T00:10:02Z")

</div>

I was using ERA5-land for the Met forcing except for precipitation. Planning to switch to BARRA2. But for JULES/CABLE comparison probably does not matter too much as long as we use the same forcing? Happy to share the forcing I have if useful for JULES/CABLE comparison.
