# Building high-resolution transport matrices from ACCESS-OM2 outputs

**URL:** <https://forum.access-hive.org.au/t/building-high-resolution-transport-matrices-from-access-om2-outputs/5431>\
**Category:** Ocean\
**Created:** [24 October 2025 03:20 UTC](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/t/building-high-resolution-transport-matrices-from-access-om2-outputs/5431 "2025-10-24T03:20:44Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![aekiss](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.access-hive.org.au/aekiss/32/46_2.png) [@aekiss](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/u/aekiss)\
**Post date:** [27 October 2025 00:13 UTC](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/t/building-high-resolution-transport-matrices-from-access-om2-outputs/5431/6 "2025-10-27T00:13:40Z")

</div>

Hi @Benoit, as @rmholmes said, the [ACCESS-OM2 Control Experiments](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/t/access-om2-control-experiments/258) are our most consistent configurations spanning the 3 resolutions.  
`01deg_jra55v140_iaf*` seem to have the variables you need, other than `tx_trans_submeso` - see  
[Data available: 0.1° 1958-2018 ACCESS-OM2 IAF runs (plus extension to 2023) – COSIMA](https://cosima.org.au/index.php/2020/07/29/data-available-0-1-1958-2018-access-om2-iaf-run/)

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/t/building-high-resolution-transport-matrices-from-access-om2-outputs/5431)._