# CABLE4 planning: meeting notes **URL:** \ **Category:** CABLE\ **Tags:** cable4-planning\ **Created:** [24 January 2024 21:48 UTC](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/t/cable4-planning-meeting-notes/1751 "2024-01-24T21:48:55Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 4
**Author:** ![RachelLaw](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/da6949/32.png) [@RachelLaw](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/u/RachelLaw)\ **Post date:** [1 February 2024 01:05 UTC](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/t/cable4-planning-meeting-notes/1751/4 "2024-02-01T01:05:13Z")
**February 15th 2024** **Previous actions status** - [review of met forcing to run CABLE-POP at ACCESS resolution is done](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/t/run-cable-pop-at-access-resolution/1697/2). - land-mask split with R converted to Python. @clairecarouge continuing with next steps with @Juergen 's support. Different solution will be required in ACCESS implementation. - gridinfo: @Jhan has had a look. Need to confirm where inputs/ancillaries are different or the same between offline/online. @jhan to write summary. **For discussion** - @juergen will give an overview over LUH2 data and Crops in Trendy CABLE-POPLUC. - Separate executable vs inline decision. See [decision and meeting notes](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/t/pop-implementation-in-access-esm3-inline-vs-separate-executable/1807/2). @clairecarouge / @inh599 - Latest single tree / grid-cell simulation @RachelLaw **Notes** - Proposal to create ‘cable tools’ to gather splitting/merging tools, pre/post processing. - Systematic test of with/without diffuse fraction to check sensitivity - Checking datasets for portability across CABLE-POP and ACCESS and which datasets we need to use from each configuration. - Conversion of restart files between offline/online. What are the critical fields that need to be passed between configurations. **Action** --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/t/cable4-planning-meeting-notes/1751)._