# Paleoclimate priorities for ACCESS-NRI to support ACCESS-ESM1.5

**URL:** <https://forum.access-hive.org.au/t/paleoclimate-priorities-for-access-nri-to-support-access-esm1-5/2121>\
**Category:** Working Group\
**Tags:** working-group, paleoclimate, access-esm-release\
**Created:** [27 May 2024 05:31 UTC](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/t/paleoclimate-priorities-for-access-nri-to-support-access-esm1-5/2121 "2024-05-27T05:31:21Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 9

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dkhutch](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.access-hive.org.au/dkhutch/32/510_2.png) [@dkhutch](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/u/dkhutch)\
**Post date:** [31 May 2024 05:54 UTC](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/t/paleoclimate-priorities-for-access-nri-to-support-access-esm1-5/2121/9 "2024-05-31T05:54:57Z")

</div>

Yes, it’s MOM5.1 as in ACCESS-ESM1.5  
I mainly mention this because if we are considering moving the atmosphere from N96 (approx 1.5 deg) to N48 (approx 3 deg), then we might also consider economising the ocean grid cells.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/t/paleoclimate-priorities-for-access-nri-to-support-access-esm1-5/2121)._