# Science configurations to use for CABLE evaluation

**URL:** <https://forum.access-hive.org.au/t/science-configurations-to-use-for-cable-evaluation/662>\
**Category:** CABLE\
**Tags:** model-evaluation\
**Created:** [11 April 2023 05:09 UTC](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/t/science-configurations-to-use-for-cable-evaluation/662 "2023-04-11T05:09:57Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![clairecarouge](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.access-hive.org.au/clairecarouge/32/380_2.png) [@clairecarouge](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/u/clairecarouge)\
**Post date:** [30 April 2023 23:59 UTC](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/t/science-configurations-to-use-for-cable-evaluation/662/3 "2023-04-30T23:59:15Z")

</div>

Some quick feedback on the analyses we are currently using in [modelevaluation.org](http://modelevaluation.org) for CABLE:

- add summary table like ILAMB dashboard.
- more variables: see if we can have the same variables as with ILAMB: radiation, hydrology and carbon.
- include some comparisons between science configurations and not just between source codes as we have now. This could be done via summary tables.
- better legends, titles of the plots to understand better what they represent.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/t/science-configurations-to-use-for-cable-evaluation/662)._