# Spin-up history of the ACCESS-ESM1.5 Pre-industrial run

**URL:** <https://forum.access-hive.org.au/t/spin-up-history-of-the-access-esm1-5-pre-industrial-run/4381>\
**Category:** Earth System Model\
**Tags:** help, cmip6, access-esm15\
**Created:** [3 April 2025 23:06 UTC](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/t/spin-up-history-of-the-access-esm1-5-pre-industrial-run/4381 "2025-04-03T23:06:18Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 8\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dkhutch](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.access-hive.org.au/dkhutch/32/510_2.png) [@dkhutch](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/u/dkhutch)\
**Post date:** [3 April 2025 23:06 UTC](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/t/spin-up-history-of-the-access-esm1-5-pre-industrial-run/4381/1 "2025-04-03T23:06:18Z")

</div>

Hi,  
I have a query about the spin-up history of the [ACCESS-ESM1.5 pre-industrial release](https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-esm1.5-configs/tree/release-preindustrial%2Bconcentrations).  
How many years has this configuration been spun-up for? (I.e. is there some equilibration built into it already?)

Is there some way we can link the years of spin-up to the Pre-industrial diagnostics that are saved in the CMIP6 archive? I.e. this one:  
/g/data/fs38/publications/CMIP6/CMIP/CSIRO/ACCESS-ESM1-5/piControl/r1i1p1f1

The ‘latest’ version of that run, i.e. v20210316, appears to start from year 101. Are these published results using the same initial restart inputs as in the ACCESS-NRI supported release?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![spencerwong](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.access-hive.org.au/spencerwong/32/1894_2.png) [@spencerwong](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/u/spencerwong)\
**Post date:** [7 April 2025 00:01 UTC](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/t/spin-up-history-of-the-access-esm1-5-pre-industrial-run/4381/2 "2025-04-07T00:01:31Z")

</div>

Hi @dkhutch,

There is some useful information on the ESM1.5 spinup in the [_The Australian Earth System Model: ACCESS-ESM1.5_ paper](https://www.publish.csiro.au/es/es19035). From the paper, the physical state was spun up for 3000 years total starting from an ESM1 restart, while the BGC was spun up for 1000 years. Model developments and parameter tuning were done iteratively during the spinup, though the model and configuration were frozen for the last 600 years.

There have been two seperate preindustrial runs done with ESM1.5: `PI-01` (with outputs at `/g/data/p73/archive/CMIP6/ACCESS-ESM1-5/PI-01`), and `PI-02` (at `/g/data/p73/archive/CMIP6/ACCESS-ESM1-5/PI-02`). `PI-01` was run on Raijin and `PI-02` was run on Gadi. I’ll try to confirm which labels match the different runs in the `fs38` archive.

The NRI release for ESM1.5 uses the first available restarts from the `PI-02` run (calendar year 101).

Due to technical limitations I believe the beginning date for the PI runs couldn’t be set at year 1, and were instead set at year 101. The initial restarts for `PI-01` and `PI-02` don’t match, and so I’m not sure if they began from different points. I’m just tagging @tiloz, who knows more of the details.

Cheers,  
Spencer

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![harshula](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.access-hive.org.au/harshula/32/256_2.png) [@harshula](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/u/harshula)\
**Post date:** [7 April 2025 00:47 UTC](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/t/spin-up-history-of-the-access-esm1-5-pre-industrial-run/4381/3 "2025-04-07T00:47:58Z")

</div>



---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dkhutch](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.access-hive.org.au/dkhutch/32/510_2.png) [@dkhutch](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/u/dkhutch)\
**Post date:** [7 April 2025 04:48 UTC](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/t/spin-up-history-of-the-access-esm1-5-pre-industrial-run/4381/4 "2025-04-07T04:48:06Z")

</div>

Thanks for this great information @spencerwong. Good to know it’s had a long spin-up. (I guess I need to read the foundation paper more closely in future 😉 )

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tiloz](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/ba8739/32.png) [@tiloz](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/u/tiloz)\
**Post date:** [8 April 2025 00:23 UTC](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/t/spin-up-history-of-the-access-esm1-5-pre-industrial-run/4381/5 "2025-04-08T00:23:38Z")

</div>

Thanks @spencerwong for the details on the spinup and control run. Just to add that the first 1000 years (PI-01) were published on the ESGF. PI-02 is a continuation of PI-01 for another 1000 years (although the simulation year was reset to 101), but as Spencer pointed out it might have been run on a different machine. I don’t think we published PI-02 on the ESGF. Overall we have 2000 (continuous) years of the picontrol run for ESM1.5

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Aidan](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.access-hive.org.au/aidan/32/42_2.png) [@Aidan](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/u/Aidan)\
**Post date:** [19 May 2025 07:09 UTC](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/t/spin-up-history-of-the-access-esm1-5-pre-industrial-run/4381/6 "2025-05-19T07:09:46Z")

</div>

Did you have any more questions @dkhutch? If not we will close this topic.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dkhutch](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.access-hive.org.au/dkhutch/32/510_2.png) [@dkhutch](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/u/dkhutch)\
**Post date:** [19 May 2025 23:45 UTC](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/t/spin-up-history-of-the-access-esm1-5-pre-industrial-run/4381/7 "2025-05-19T23:45:55Z")

</div>

Hi Aidan,  
Thanks, no further questions from me at this stage.  
Cheers, Dave

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Aidan](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.access-hive.org.au/aidan/32/42_2.png) [@Aidan](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/u/Aidan)\
**Post date:** [19 May 2025 23:55 UTC](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/t/spin-up-history-of-the-access-esm1-5-pre-industrial-run/4381/8 "2025-05-19T23:55:45Z")

</div>


