# \#packaging

**URL:** https://forum.access-hive.org.au/tag/packaging/128.md

[Latest](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/latest.md) · [Categories](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/categories.md) · [Tags](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/tags.md)

---

## [pyOpenSci will review your package](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/t/pyopensci-will-review-your-package/447)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@Aidan](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/u/Aidan)\
**Replies:** 0\
**Last updated:** [22 February 2023 03:41 UTC](https://forum.access-hive.org.au/t/pyopensci-will-review-your-package/447 "2023-02-22T03:41:07Z")

</div>

As this post on the pangeo lays out: pyOpenSci will review your open source scientific python package and help you achieve best practice in python packaging. Nice! If you’re wondering if you should get them to review…
