ACCESS-CM3 Southern Ocean Convection in coastal and open ocean polynyas

Following todays discussion at the CM3 evaluation meeting I investigated further the 3 areas identified as convection areas in @AndyHoggANU plots of convection in year 50 of the “cm3-20-01-2026” run. Also briefly looked at year 40 and year 80. Only one of them meets the criteria that would normally used to describe open ocean convection by the community at ~170W 68S. The other regions were caused by coastal polynyas which occurred repeatedly at the same locations, so are driven by katabatic winds off the Antarctic continent so lead to deep mixed layer next to the coast. These may not be at the correct locations for polynyas but are not far from the correct locations (see work of Alex Fraser), which are regions of low, thin ice concentration, and high ice production so high levels of ocean mixing on the shelf and dense shelf waters and potentially off shelf flow if the conditions are right. The other locations picked up in the density derived Mixed layer depth field in mlotst are at the continental shelf break and represent genuine overflow conditions as represented by the “coarse’ 0.25 representation in CM3 in the Ross and Weddell Seas.

I will add a few plots, I have loads more (like a folders of > 70). One reason this was hard to detect, from just scanning ice cover each year for open ocean polynyas is that the open ocean convection at 170W occurs late in the season in October, as the ice starts to open up, and then refreezes during a cold outbreak rather than mid-Winter, Aug-Sep when ice conditions in the region are around 90%. The ice cover also has a local minima at 170W, but barely detectable in 1440 E-W CM3 grid points and the coastal polynya thin ice points are way more noticeable.

The cause of the polynya at 170W 68S is series of sub subsurface topography features upstream and from 160E-180W 68-70S.

The feature does contaminate the age tracer if looking to detect bottom water formation regions, but small scale coastal polynyas also are an issue as well.

Mixed layer depth year 50 of run in Ross sea showing deep mixing at 170W 68S, mixing at Ross ice shelf caused by polynya which opens each spring and along continental shelf break as dense waters overflow.

Mixed layer depth year 50 of the CM3 run in the Weddell Sea with intermittent coastal polynyas 0-25E and mixing at the continental shelf break as dense shelf water overflows.

I showed the age tracer in the meeting today along this section at 40W in the Weddell Sea here is confirmation from the density section that it represented local overflow rather than an upstream signal of an overflow of the dense shelf water as represented at 0.25 resolution.

Salinity section from year 40 of CM3 simulation polynya was still present at 25E, not all coastal polynyas found at all locations all model years, this a more common one, Recent brine rejection down to 1000m, mixing over last decade down to 3000m.

Temperature section of Open ocean convection in year 50 of CM3 along 170W in October, (September shows only mild activity, August none), showing active convection to 2500m in narrow chimney at 68S, surface signature in ice and SST minor.

Temperature section 10 years earlier shows convective activity was centred 72-69S again signal was only significant in October, barely present when ice was more compact and colder in mid-winter Aug-Sept conditions.

Final figure, of topography of region, along 68S at 160E two islands then there are small ridges/seamounts between 170E and 180E/W 67-69S rising to 1000m in height, which are the likely cause of the mixing, The region is also part of the Southern edge of the ACC, so has strengthening current flows.

.

1 Like

Thanks @sofarrell - I agree that the open ocean convection is weaker than I had first thought, and the overflows you show give me more hope that we are on track. Probably not much more until we have the capability to improve the freshwater flux distribution to retain more ice shelf freshwater on the continental shelf?

Thanks @AndyHoggANU, Mentioned the feature today to @aekiss at the end of his OM3 evaluation talk at COSIMA, there is no real signal in OM3 two plots below at 1330m 50 years into the run illustrate the difference, the first is from the older run on (from ol01) outputting conservative temperature, so temperatures look slightly different but are now corrected in latest OM3 runs, which I didn’t find may be under personal user ids.

This lower plot still has OM3 in title but is from 50years into the CM3 run (will fix in future runs that’s what todays chat messages with @cbull where about in relation to diag_table). You can see the increased mixing behind the topography as surface convection, reaches this depth as the ice starts to open up in October.

OOps its lost its numbers on the colour bar but they were the same.

Thanks @sofarrell for sharing the figures, very cool to see that there seems to be very little convection in the open ocean!

The convection in the Ross Sea also exists to some extend in OM2-01. As you say, this may be related to topography and maybe not something we can “fix” easily.

I’m curious to see how changing the freshwater input (i.e. adding some next to the coastline) will affect the results. So definitely a +1 from me to run those experiments. I expect the shelf water bias to be reduced (less dense) but am unsure how the open ocean will change - will we loose surface stratification?

Hi @wghuneke it will be interesting to see how the coastal input and spreading scheme @anton is working on will work, will the runoff be down the same basins that we get the strongest downslope katabatic winds, which might affect the frequency of the coastal polynyas. Yes there was a small impact in OM3 from the topography in the offshore convection region, I guess we can see if the FW changes help, and then do some changes to topography as I said to @aekiss we have done them elsewhere, it may be only reducing the height of those peaks which come up to 1000m, not sure how important the small islands are to the local dynamics perhaps we should look at 1/10 degree run or the regional MOM6. The topography sits between the coastal current and the stronger ACC.

Hi @wghuneke Just looked at access-om2-01 and found that it too had this mixing issue, though runs with KPP even though it didn’t show in the MLD plots. Whilst the panan-01 which is a shorter run and has ePBL mixing on does not appear to have the same major open ocean mixing issue downstream of the topography, some minor topographic mixing occurs at the topographic features. Panan-01 still does have coastal polynyas though. I guess it also does not have any FW near the coast. Will post some plots tomorrow.

1 Like

Hi @wghuneke the plot of mixing differences in the two 1/10 degree resolution runs (om2-01 and panant-01) are seen clearly in fields like age tracers at mid depth 517m, temperature sections downstream of the topography that caused the mixing, ice concentration fields. The velocity fields are also highly variable in the access-om2-01 model, downstream of the feature but I am less sure if that is due to the topographic feature but it maybe, as it has high eddy variability.

This is the temperature section at 170W in the access-om2-01 model downstream of the topographic feature which comes a few 100m closer to the surface than the om3/cm3-025 resolution models discussed above at 180W.

In the Panant-01 resolution model there was only mixing at the topographic feature at 180 W not downstream, at 170W, and a more stable stratification with ePBL mixing scheme used.

The age tracer at 517m for the ACCESS-om2-01 model showed the mixing at 68-70S 170W, whilst it didn’t show in the MLD depth profile which are based on density calculation. My guess is the higher density in the bottom water from the local overflows from the continental shelf may have altered the profile so this mixing region wasn’t picked up, but I have yet to check.

The high mixed layer depths in this plot are all along the continental shelf/slope regions and represent overflow regions in the model, there were no coastal polynyas in the model at these locations in the ice fields for the Om2-01 runs.