Hi everyone,
A few points about the ACCESS-NRI CMIP7 hackathon. Here are three important topics we discussed:
- ESMValTool tasks: things that needs to be addressed to improve our workflow.
- Sanity checks: parameters to monitor to quickly detect when something is wrong.
- Evaluation: checking how the new configuration compares to references (analysis/reanalysis and/or previous configurations).
Here are editable tables concerning these three topics.
Feel free to edit to modify or add tasks/checks/metrics.
Do not delete existing lines, rather upgrade / downgrade the priority:
1 = upmost priority (needs to be done quickly)
2 = essential (needed for the development of the model)
3 = low importance (we’ll do it when we have time)
4 = not important (it was nice to think about it but we’ll most likely never do it)
ESMValTool tasks | Detailed description | Priority |
---|---|---|
Use native ACCESS-output in ESMValTool | capacity to analyse ACCESS output without CMORization | 1 |
ERA5 | we could not use ERA5 during hackathon | 1 |
Simple ESMValTool standard recipes | we need very simple plug and play recipes for which we only need to change input variable, input simulation, input region [current ipcc recipes may be a good starting point but they are all in ncl] | 2 |
Running ESMValTool from a jupyter notebook | important for testing or on a research basis | 3 |
Sanity checks | Detailed description | Priority |
---|---|---|
Earth energy balance | incoming (rsdt) minus outgoing (rlut + rsut) energy | 1 |
Earth water conservation | global mean sea level | 1 |
Earth surface temperature | global mean surface temperature | 1 |
Earth surface fluxes | net surface fluxes (rsds - rsus + rlds - rlus - hfls - hfss) | 2 |
Earth surface moisture budget | water flux balance (pr - evspsbl - delta[mrtws] = 0) | 2 |
Evaluation | Detailed description | Reference | Priority | Timeframe |
---|---|---|---|---|
standard recipe Taylor diagram | see task | comparison with old model, other models, obs to see how new runs look different | 1 | asap |
standard recipe maps | see tasks; (can be part of the taylor diagram recipe) | as above | 1 | asap |
Climate sensitivity | 1 | when model stable | ||
monsoon seasonal cycle | rainfall seasonality in SH summer monsoon regions (~Brazil, South Africa, North Australia) | GPCP | 2 | when ready |
ITF transport | ? | 2 | when ready | |
modes of varibility (ENSO, IOD, IPO, SAM) seasonal cycle | ERSSTv5, HadISST | 2 | when ready | |
modes of varibility amplitude | as above | 3 | when ready | |
modes of varibility spectrum | as above | 3 | when ready | |
MJO East/West power ratio | 3 | when ready | ||
ENSO processes/feedback | 3 | long simulations / large ensembles needed | ||
Tropical cyclones | 3 | when model stable | ||
Position of Jet / Rossby waves | 3 | long simulations / large ensembles needed |
We think that for a proper evaluation of modes of variability a long simulation (or a large ensemble) is needed. However, it is still important to evaluate them as we develop the model by comparing them to a long simulation (or a large ensemble) computed with a previous configuration of the model.