Land working group, meeting notes 2026

03/02/2026 meeting

Participants: 13

Presentation by Clare Stephens on plant hydraulics

CABLE output redesign
Need community feedback on proposed design. See topic on this new design: Proposed CABLE Output Redesign

Feedback welcome over the next month

ACCESS-NRI work plan for FY 26-27
Looking for community input early.

CABLE and JULES comparison
Is there interest in coordinating a comparison exercise in the Earth system configuration in the historical and scenarios space?
Is there scope to make this a bigger activity with LPJ-GUESS and DAVE?

2 ideas if there is interest:

  • get together to scope the project supported through the Bureau of Meteorology
  • or should it be part of the land working group annual workshop in September.

Anna: keen to pursue a CABLE/JULES comparison over Australia. Adding a JULES-ES/CABLE-CASA comparison would be great.

Ian: problem for running ES simulations is the spinup.

Gab: can be included to know what is happening and if he can participate. Could we add the CABLE-TRENDY type version as well as CABLE-main?

Ian: need coordination to decide on which configurations to bring in. Seems to have enough interest to push this further

Anna: question of the weather generator. People interested in the AGCD dataset to force the model but it’s daily data. What to update the weather generator to?

What met forcing:

Siyuan: work has been going on with the CCI ancillaries by Mat and Lachlan. For the forcings, the Bureau uses AGCD for rainfall and uses ERA5 for other forcings. Looking at bias-correction of BARRA against AGCD.

Gab: could we get collaboration from UKCH folks who are already using JULES-ES?

Contact Ian if you want to be involved.

minor clarification: the Bureau potentially has scope to support an kick-off activity (meeting/workshop) this FY - negotiations are still happening.

I should’ve been more patient. I couldn’t get through so I went to lunch. Definitely September for CABLE-JULES comparison and BoM. Realistically I cant see this working with ESM1.6, circa MOSES (not JULES) in which case we have to get AM3+CASA back on track anyway.

03/03/2026

Participants:

Presentation by Belinda Medlyn on DAVE: Dynamics of Australian Vegetation

At the meeting, Belinda raised the idea of a community paper about land surface modelling in Australia, including presenting the models we are using, the climate driving data, the benchmarking data, etc., as well as a research agenda.

17/03/2026

Participants: 11

Discussion on the experiments from Mat and Siyuan
Hoping to start this week.

Working group project

  • Ancillary workflow:

    • discussion on the vegetation mapping. Need a bigger discussion to decide on the additional data we need to generate the mapping for CABLE. Schedule the discussion at the working group level.
  • Met forcing pre-processor

    • Work on processing ERA5 is underway. It can process a month of ERA5 data at a time currently in a reasonable amount of time. Working towards shortening the time and/or processing more data at a time.
  • JULES vs CABLE comparison

    • waiting on the ancillary workflow
    • it would be good to have groundwater in CABLE for these comparisons
  • Historical branch merges

    • groundwater is slowly progressing
    • it is now possible to run BIOS from CABLE-POP_TRENDY branch
    • BLAZE needs to be ported to CABLE-POP_TRENDY branch
    • Then the major merge left will be CABLE-POP_TRENDY and main. It is unclear how this should progress. It would be good to discuss at the upcoming ESM/Land working groups workshop.

07/04/2026

Participants: 12

Quick recap

The meeting focused on two main topics: the CCI vegetation mapping for CABLE and preparation for the upcoming ESM/Land workshop. Lachlan presented the current CCI ancillary suite implementation for AM3, highlighting differences between the new mapping and existing AM3 land cover distributions, particularly regarding tundra classification and bare soil fractions. The team discussed challenges with model-specific requirements between JULES and CABLE, including different handling of bare soil and LAI calculations. For the workshop preparation, Alex sought community input on potential invited speakers, with suggestions made to reach out to land surface modeling groups in Australia, including Ben Smith’s and Jatin’s teams, rather than focusing solely on international speakers due to budget constraints. The workshop was confirmed for August 31st to September 2nd at the Angler Center in the CBD.

Next steps

  • All: Provide ideas for supplementary datasets that would improve the current land cover maps (see this topic)
  • Lachlan and Matt: Determine which types are most amenable to changing the current splits
  • Lachlan and Matt: Add issues to the GitHub repository regarding the discussed problems with the CCI ancillary suite
  • Alex: Take suggestions for invited speakers back to the workshop committee for consideration
  • Alex: Consider options for ECR support and social events with the workshop committee
  • Anyone interested: Contact Claire if they know someone with interesting content to present at our land working group meetings

Summary

CCI Ancillary Suite Update

Lachlan presented an update on the CCI ancillary suite for AM3, which is now operational but not yet science tested. He explained the process of converting the 38 land cover types from the CCI dataset to the model’s types, including handling permanent water and sea classifications. Lachlan showed a comparison between the new CCI-based land cover distribution and the current AM3 release, highlighting significant differences in vegetation patterns. He asked the group whether the first science-ready configuration should aim to match the current AM3 distribution patterns.

Differences between JULES and CABLE

It was noted JULES and CABLE codes handle bare soil differently. JULES add bare soil to create sparser vegetation whereas CABLE handles it within the code and considers bare soil to be actually barren. Rachel shared insights from Eva’s paper about differences in vegetation mapping between Moses, Cable, and Jules models, particularly regarding LAI values and bare ground distribution.

Land Cover Classification Challenges Discussion

The team discussed challenges with land cover classification, particularly regarding the separation of C3 and C4 vegetation types and the absence of tundra classification in the current CCI product. It was discussed bringing in additional information from IGBP although this is an older dataset. The workflow allows for bringing in additional steps after an initial classification step using a crosswalk table between CCI classes and CABLE PFTs.

The group agreed on the need to better document their data processing methods and avoid assuming current AM3 implementations are optimal, with Ian emphasizing the importance of proper provenance documentation and assessment.

The group also discussed the possibility of introducing specific handling for Australia in future versions and ensuring the workflow can generate both global and regional models at various resolutions.

ESM Coupled Land Workshop Planning

The team also discussed preparations for an upcoming September workshop, with Alex seeking input on how to allocate a limited budget, including options for social events, ECR support, or inviting an international speaker. They agreed to prioritize local or national speakers due to budget constraints and the workshop’s size, with suggestions made to reach out to Ben Smith’s group and Jatin’s group in Western Australia. The team also discussed the possibility of having a hybrid speaker who could present remotely, though this was not the initial plan. The workshop is scheduled for August 31st to September 2nd at the Angler Center in the CBD.