Land working group, meeting notes 2026

03/02/2026 meeting

Participants: 13

Presentation by Clare Stephens on plant hydraulics

CABLE output redesign
Need community feedback on proposed design. See topic on this new design: Proposed CABLE Output Redesign

Feedback welcome over the next month

ACCESS-NRI work plan for FY 26-27
Looking for community input early.

CABLE and JULES comparison
Is there interest in coordinating a comparison exercise in the Earth system configuration in the historical and scenarios space?
Is there scope to make this a bigger activity with LPJ-GUESS and DAVE?

2 ideas if there is interest:

  • get together to scope the project supported through the Bureau of Meteorology
  • or should it be part of the land working group annual workshop in September.

Anna: keen to pursue a CABLE/JULES comparison over Australia. Adding a JULES-ES/CABLE-CASA comparison would be great.

Ian: problem for running ES simulations is the spinup.

Gab: can be included to know what is happening and if he can participate. Could we add the CABLE-TRENDY type version as well as CABLE-main?

Ian: need coordination to decide on which configurations to bring in. Seems to have enough interest to push this further

Anna: question of the weather generator. People interested in the AGCD dataset to force the model but it’s daily data. What to update the weather generator to?

What met forcing:

Siyuan: work has been going on with the CCI ancillaries by Mat and Lachlan. For the forcings, the Bureau uses AGCD for rainfall and uses ERA5 for other forcings. Looking at bias-correction of BARRA against AGCD.

Gab: could we get collaboration from UKCH folks who are already using JULES-ES?

Contact Ian if you want to be involved.

minor clarification: the Bureau potentially has scope to support an kick-off activity (meeting/workshop) this FY - negotiations are still happening.

I should’ve been more patient. I couldn’t get through so I went to lunch. Definitely September for CABLE-JULES comparison and BoM. Realistically I cant see this working with ESM1.6, circa MOSES (not JULES) in which case we have to get AM3+CASA back on track anyway.

03/03/2026

Participants:

Presentation by Belinda Medlyn on DAVE: Dynamics of Australian Vegetation

At the meeting, Belinda raised the idea of a community paper about land surface modelling in Australia, including presenting the models we are using, the climate driving data, the benchmarking data, etc., as well as a research agenda.

17/03/2026

Participants: 11

Discussion on the experiments from Mat and Siyuan
Hoping to start this week.

Working group project

  • Ancillary workflow:

    • discussion on the vegetation mapping. Need a bigger discussion to decide on the additional data we need to generate the mapping for CABLE. Schedule the discussion at the working group level.
  • Met forcing pre-processor

    • Work on processing ERA5 is underway. It can process a month of ERA5 data at a time currently in a reasonable amount of time. Working towards shortening the time and/or processing more data at a time.
  • JULES vs CABLE comparison

    • waiting on the ancillary workflow
    • it would be good to have groundwater in CABLE for these comparisons
  • Historical branch merges

    • groundwater is slowly progressing
    • it is now possible to run BIOS from CABLE-POP_TRENDY branch
    • BLAZE needs to be ported to CABLE-POP_TRENDY branch
    • Then the major merge left will be CABLE-POP_TRENDY and main. It is unclear how this should progress. It would be good to discuss at the upcoming ESM/Land working groups workshop.

07/04/2026

Participants: 12

Quick recap

The meeting focused on two main topics: the CCI vegetation mapping for CABLE and preparation for the upcoming ESM/Land workshop. Lachlan presented the current CCI ancillary suite implementation for AM3, highlighting differences between the new mapping and existing AM3 land cover distributions, particularly regarding tundra classification and bare soil fractions. The team discussed challenges with model-specific requirements between JULES and CABLE, including different handling of bare soil and LAI calculations. For the workshop preparation, Alex sought community input on potential invited speakers, with suggestions made to reach out to land surface modeling groups in Australia, including Ben Smith’s and Jatin’s teams, rather than focusing solely on international speakers due to budget constraints. The workshop was confirmed for August 31st to September 2nd at the Angler Center in the CBD.

Next steps

  • All: Provide ideas for supplementary datasets that would improve the current land cover maps (see this topic)
  • Lachlan and Matt: Determine which types are most amenable to changing the current splits
  • Lachlan and Matt: Add issues to the GitHub repository regarding the discussed problems with the CCI ancillary suite
  • Alex: Take suggestions for invited speakers back to the workshop committee for consideration
  • Alex: Consider options for ECR support and social events with the workshop committee
  • Anyone interested: Contact Claire if they know someone with interesting content to present at our land working group meetings

Summary

CCI Ancillary Suite Update

Lachlan presented an update on the CCI ancillary suite for AM3, which is now operational but not yet science tested. He explained the process of converting the 38 land cover types from the CCI dataset to the model’s types, including handling permanent water and sea classifications. Lachlan showed a comparison between the new CCI-based land cover distribution and the current AM3 release, highlighting significant differences in vegetation patterns. He asked the group whether the first science-ready configuration should aim to match the current AM3 distribution patterns.

Differences between JULES and CABLE

It was noted JULES and CABLE codes handle bare soil differently. JULES add bare soil to create sparser vegetation whereas CABLE handles it within the code and considers bare soil to be actually barren. Rachel shared insights from Eva’s paper about differences in vegetation mapping between Moses, Cable, and Jules models, particularly regarding LAI values and bare ground distribution.

Land Cover Classification Challenges Discussion

The team discussed challenges with land cover classification, particularly regarding the separation of C3 and C4 vegetation types and the absence of tundra classification in the current CCI product. It was discussed bringing in additional information from IGBP although this is an older dataset. The workflow allows for bringing in additional steps after an initial classification step using a crosswalk table between CCI classes and CABLE PFTs.

The group agreed on the need to better document their data processing methods and avoid assuming current AM3 implementations are optimal, with Ian emphasizing the importance of proper provenance documentation and assessment.

The group also discussed the possibility of introducing specific handling for Australia in future versions and ensuring the workflow can generate both global and regional models at various resolutions.

ESM Coupled Land Workshop Planning

The team also discussed preparations for an upcoming September workshop, with Alex seeking input on how to allocate a limited budget, including options for social events, ECR support, or inviting an international speaker. They agreed to prioritize local or national speakers due to budget constraints and the workshop’s size, with suggestions made to reach out to Ben Smith’s group and Jatin’s group in Western Australia. The team also discussed the possibility of having a hybrid speaker who could present remotely, though this was not the initial plan. The workshop is scheduled for August 31st to September 2nd at the Angler Center in the CBD.

05/05/2026

Participants: 7

Presentation ideas:

  • Jatin (@clairecarouge to contact him)
  • people at CSIRO about their effort around land surface modelling, better for later than now.
  • Ulrike’s team
  • CMIP7 carbon talk by Rachel or Alex
  • Alison’s student
  • Mathias Cuntz (ask Juergen)
  • Marcus Thatcher for CABLE in CCAM
  • Alison on her simulations for her current paper
  • Alex about work on the visualisation project

Combined WG meeting

Is it worth having a combined meeting with ESM in the lead-up to the workshop in Melbourne?
Worth having a land/atmosphere joint meeting at some point.

Make a better effort to advertise relevant presentations to other working groups.

ESM/Land workshop

Need to discuss at the land WG how to organise the land workshop session.

Training ideas:

  • ACCESS-AM3: running, developing and evaluation.
  • benchcab / me.org
  • documentation or documentation with AI or more generally a discussion about the use of AI in the community.
  • ESM1.6 training? Could be of interest to the ESM folks.

19/05/2026

Participants: 8

Working group projects:

  • CABLE vs JULES comparison: 3 years of ACCESS-rAM3 from 2012-2014 with BoM’s updated land cover map.
  • Ancillary workflow: fix for the land/sea mask mismatch for sea-ice by forcing everything under 60°S to ice. Experiences in n96 and n512 configurations will be run at 21st Century weather, with and without urban.

ESM/Land workshop

Reminder submissions are open. There will be a hackathon on ESM1.6 evaluation at the workshop.
Question about JULES training at the workshop:

  • maybe not a lot of interest
  • but it would be useful to have written documentation on how to run JULES offline.

Are there any connections to the observation communities? Not so far, but the idea raised some interest and would be worth exploring for future workshops.

Evaluation of ESM1.6

Romain has advertised the workflow to go from ESM1.6 outputs to ILAMB is ready: Early ACCESS-ESM1.6 ILAMB Evaluation Pipeline Using ACCESS-MOPPy

CSIRO will do a detailed analysis of the carbon cycle but the biogeophysics might not be evaluated to the same degree. There might also be some interesting research for some students.

Other business

Raised the question of support for mdssdiff.

Discussion on how to use a personal CABLE version for a publication:

  • introduction of the pub-SHA tag to identify these and provide a URL to point to in a publication.
  • request new tags from the CABLE admin team (on the forum or via a CABLE issue)
  • update to the CABLE documentation to come shortly.

02/06/2026

Participants: 11

Discussion on GEWEX-Pan-Glass and LSMS2 summit
If people want to coordinate what is presented at these meetings, it would be good to know. @gab is going to both, @siyuan is going to Pan-Glass, @clairecarouge and @lachlanswhyborn are going to LSMS2.

ESM1.6 evaluation
@inh599 looking for interest for a focus activity for this evaluation.

Use the same infrastructure as for CM3 and AM3. Provides a good infrastructure to coordinate the evaluation across several people.

@clairecarouge to look at running more ESM1.6 outputs through ILAMB. Need to advertise the ILAMB pipeline for ESM1.6 to the land community. It would be good to put the output on the web (me.org?) so it’s easier for the community to view. It would be good to have more than ESM1.6, for example, ESM1.5 ensemble mean or CMIP6 model mean.

Are we in a position to run the LMIP experiment? Probably not in our capacity to ensure we have a standalone version that is close enough to ESM1.6.

AM3 high resolution
Land-atmosphere analyses that would be of interest to run? Mat suggesting to look at soil moisture trends to ensure the initialisation is not too bad, but the run is quite short. Is 3 years too short?
Could be run through ILAMB, but not a lot of datasets at this resolution. Format of the output might not be compatible with ILAMB as is, UKMO has been using ILAMB so there might be a driver somewhere.
Comparison to flux towers: possible but be mindful of the heterogeneity of the gridcells.
Looking at intense weather events to get an idea of the value of the higher resolution.

NDRI funding for ACCESS-NRI

  • CMIP proposal funded at 85%
  • AUCRI (urban climate) proposal funded at 35%

Workshops
Land and Coupled Modelling workshop: Abstracts are due on Friday

Agenda out for the Momentum User workshop is out. ESM session on Wednesday from 10pm - midnight. Land session on Thursday about 6pm.

16/06/2026

Participants: 8

Ancillary workflow: problem at high resolution with land/sea mask discrepancies between the mask we get from the ocean and the CCI mask. Not sure what is happening and why the vegetation type isn’t filled in with a spiral search like other points are dealt with.
Urban work: missing ancillaries. Working on adding these ancillaries now from CESM data. Will add the urban scripts to the ancillary suite.

Met-forcing pre-processor: Working on improving the performance. Had a recent improvement but not enough. Looking at splitting the calculations per variable in separate jobs. Currently would take 40 days to process the entire 60 years of data.

JULES-UM coupled: now have 5 years. Differences seen using 2 datasets, comparing to OzFlux.
Bug in AM3: bulk thermal heat capacity coming from ancillaries is not being picked up by CABLE.
Lachlan has started putting the data from the ancillary suite into a gridinfo format for use in offline. But there is a question about how to initialise the soil temperature and soil moisture. It would not matter much if running a spin-up for offline simulations. Discussed the interpolation of soil temperature and soil moisture between 2 land surface models.

BLAZE and groundwater: Looking at what the fire model works and looking at how to get it work in the coupled model. No progress on groundwater.

ILAMB results for ESM1.6
Some results are now available on me.org: ModelEvaluation.org
There are still some details to fix: Early ACCESS-ESM1.6 ILAMB Evaluation Pipeline Using ACCESS-MOPPy

We would want to have all the ensemble members for historical, also other CMIP6 models.

Discussing presentations at the land working group
Group interested in hearing from Marcus soon. It might be tricky to find the perfect date for it because of workshops and other trips.