Questions for Spack meeting

Can we get some more info about this issue?

Seems like it has been acknowledged as something to be fixed?

As a work-around to above I’ve tried to use the spack hash to force package reuse as recommended in a previous telecom, but this does not seem to work

See

Can a variant support an arbitrary string as user input? e.g. variant(var, default="none", description=var, values="*", multi=False)

Answer: Dynamic variants: we don’t seem to document this anywhere I can find, and I don’t see any examples in our builtin repo, but we do have a test which basically does what you are doing in spack-packages/packages/um/package.py at 9e984d69c91580748fc05b5af46dd5a9566f565a · ACCESS-NRI/spack-packages · GitHub, so we are enforcing it at the test level (FWIW that test is called test_wild_card_valued_variants_equivalent_to_str)

Can the compiler wrapper output be put in the .spack directory when a standard spack installis executed? We are using Spack v0.22 and we need to run spack -d install and the output (spack-cc*.out) files are in the working directory.