CABLE4 planning: meeting notes

May 8th

For discussion

  • do we need an ILAMB update?
  • Australian PFTs - meeting tomorrow?
  • Non-uniform canopy height

Notes

  • further updates for ilamb pre-processing waiting on Romain for approving (currently O/S)
  • Agreed to go ahead with Australian PFT meeting for Friday. Discussed getting more clarity on which parameter values will be important / most sensitive - both in pft_params.nml and pftlookup file.
  • @RachelLaw shared canopy height slides - heights based on wood pool for trees and LAI for grasses. Grass pfts have seasonality but grid-cell canopy height dominated by tree height. Using different scaling factor to give taller c4 grass/crop than c3 grass/crop. @Jhan has run test with new canopy heights in vegfunc file produced by @lachlanswhyborn. Seems to be running stably. Looked at daily output for first month to see when results deviate. Occurs from first day so suggests canopy height being updated at start of run, not relying on canopy height from restart file (which was left at the original values). Need to confirm, then look for any impact over longer means.

May 15th

For discussion

  • Australian PFTs - progress on distribution
  • Non-uniform canopy height - results from test run

Notes

  • @alexnorton showed progress on zeric/mesic distributions for Australia and how NVIS data has been processed to produce these distributions. Discussion of the resulting mesic fractions in Central Australia. Due to open mixed woodlands. Agreed to split these 50% to xeric and mesic rather than all to mesic. Considered how to merge with LUH3 data for change in land-use but expect to be reasonable to implement as so much of Australia is classified as non-forest by LUH3.
  • @RachelLaw showed slides with results from Jhan’s run using spatially dependent canopy height (but fixed via ancillary not interactive). Some changes in temperature, precip, wind speed. Wind speed changes most noticeable for grass/shrub/tundra areas where relative change in height can be reasonably large. Discussion of next steps and whether to try and make canopy height interactive - and what the impact would be under future conditions. Noted that if stayed with using ancillary then need to consider what dataset to use to create the ancillary e.g. long-term mean of LAI rather than individual year as currently used. Agreed that worth coding up interactive case since should be relatively simple but need to be careful about where it is updated etc.

May 22nd

Apologies
Juergen, Ben, Claire
Jhan?

For discussion

  • Issue with code/restart for testing Australian pfts
    Current status from Jhan:
    • feat-Aust-PFTs-106 failed at dt=50
    • Turning off LAIfeedback it worked
    • BUT fields in restart looked sorta OK
    • Tested without Aust PFTs in feat-test-mainB leads to same failure at dt=50
    • Focused on feat-test-mainB to remove potential conflation of issues
    • gLAI on first timestep seems to be issue
    • multiple, alternative restarts work. Alternative to PI-02-WithLUH3VegetationMap_2025-03-14.astart, PI-02-WithLUH3VegetationMap.astart
    • Remaking the Aust PFTs from any of these alternatives will (almost) certainly get passed the initial crash
    • This is not a guarantee that there will be no further issues with Aust PFTs
    Obviously we need to get this resolved ASAP.

  • @inh599 - do you need any input for talks?

Notes

  • @lachlanswhyborn has made new restarts but initial look suggests not what was expected (one file has Australian 2/4 replaced with 12/13 when wasn’t expected). Also need to confirm that canopy height in restart not used as set to zero for 12, 13. Previous year tile fraction looks like LUH2 while current year looks like LUH3 - though previous year shouldn’t be used without l_luc flag switched on. @lachlanswhyborn will create some more restarts and @Jhan will continue with test runs.
  • If not a restart problem, have we missed something in the code which is dependent on hard-wired vegetation type - presumably in CASA?
  • For ilamb prep, @inh599 has written script to adjust dates on files so that can compare difference sections of runs.

Short answer - yes.

An additional topic for discussion:

  • progress with using the ilamb-tree-generator for purposes of benchmarking ACCESS-ESM1.6

May 29th

Apologies
Claire, Ben, Rachel, Tilo

For discussion (Alex has agreed to run the meeting)

Notes

  • Progress on Australian PFTs:
    • Need to integrate new C3/C4 fraction of grasslands data from Sam Munroe et al. (A vegetation carbon isoscape for Australia built by combining continental-scale field surveys with remote sensing | Landscape Ecology) - @Juergen to get in touch with Sam to let her know about the intended data use.
    • Parameters: Rachel and Alex are fine-tuning the “wish-list” of most important parameters to send to WSU team - Laura Williams and Belinda Medlyn. They will provide trait data where available, Laura has an idea of how to map species-level data to our PFT classes. Juergen and Alex agree that we will need to do a global comparison of tree type PFT parameters following the new assignment of Aus PFT parameters, to ensure the ‘relative’ differences are sensible.
    • Restart file tests: Changed PFT 2 to 12, and PFT 4 to 13 across entire globe. This resulted in no change in screen temperature - considered a successful test. Next test is to limit the PFT changes just to the Australian region. Lachlan and/or Jhan should have results by next week.

June 5th

Apologies: Tilo, Ian

For discussion

  • Model test with global swap of 2/12 and 4/13 showing some odd behaviour for type 13. What have we missed?
  • Progress on parameter values
  • Vegetation distribution without Australian pfts. @alexnorton has prepared a new version, waiting on @RachelLaw to review.
  • Configuration ‘to do’ table. Review of land items.

Notes

PFT swaps:

  • Rachel: The GPP is collapsing (to 0) for PFT 13 after several years of simulation.
  • Lachlan: run with zeroing out the PFTs 2 and 4 is creating differences in the run while these have a tile fraction of 0.
  • It would be useful if the collapse is reproducible if starting the run on that year to make a shorter testcase to work with.
  • Alex: Is there any chance there is a PFT-dependence left in the coupling? Could we use Rachel’s single point simulations to track the issue? Or the offline CABLE code although it isn’t in sync with ESM1.6 (Claire)

Parameter values:

  • Rachel working on the pftlookup file. Trying to identify the parameters we are using and we need values for.
  • Rachel: In the CABLE documentation, it would be good for the parameters to identified if they are used only with certain options.

Vegetation distribution without Australian PFTs:

  • Rachel reviewing

Configuration ‘to do’ table review:

  • Need to add the CABLE library work.
  • vcmax work: still in evaluation of the longer-term implications. The advantage is that it would require less parameters to tune.
  • seasonality of the carbon fluxes needs to be looked at.

June 12th

Apologies: Ian

For discussion

  • Alternative vcmax feedback @alexnorton
  • 2/12 and 4/13 pft swap

Notes

  • ACCESS workshop - coordination of abstracts:

    • Claire: Poster on recent updates to CABLE
    • Abhaas: met forcing pre-processor (most likely for the Land Working Group workshop)
    • Tilo: ESM1.6 fast track generic talk
    • Alex: ESM1.6 Land talk - Australian PFTs and other changes
    • Rachel and Jhan: Land carbon in AM3
  • vcmax feedback:

    • Alex: Evaluation still in progress but the changes in the simulation look to be as expected.
    • Rachel: Looking at the NEE and the effect on the seasonal cycle would be good.
    • Tilo: look at changes in interannual variability for NEE and GPP.
    • Rachel: we need a new run alongside the June spinup once we have fixed the handling of C4 crop for Walker’s vcmax calculations.
  • 2/12 and 4/13 pft swap:

    • collapsing of productivity is happening right from the start at some points, focus on these points to try and find the root of the issue.
    • Jhan exploring issues of reproducibility of that.
    • Rachel: phenology change on the phase has been put in the code so we can’t expect bit-reproducibility.
    • Rachel: also found points with productivity that switches off then on.
    • Lachlan to prepare restarts with only switching 2/12 and only 4/13 to allow for more cases to test on.
    • Rachel found some more hard-wired indices on PFTs in the wood thinning code (assumes the tree PFTs are the first 4 PFTs).
    • Lachlan is also trying to get ESM1.6 simulation working through the DDT debugger.
  • parameter list for the new PFTs

    • Need a list of PFT parameters needed for the new PFTs that we can share with Western Sydney for their input.
    • Alex to send the list as it currently stands since it is almost finished.

June 19th

For discussion

  • Alternative vcmax - impact on leaf respiration
  • Latest on Australian pfts

Notes

Alternative vcmax

  • Comparison of Walker with before for seasonal cycle of GPP, soil respiration, NPP and NEP. Big suppression of NEP boreal maximum.
  • NEP suppression in evergreen needleleaf. Suppression not seen in plant respiration. Massive increase in leaf respiration: Leaf respiration ratio to GPP is pushed to 0.5 which is way too high.
  • vcmax increasing by 2.5 times but leaf respiration increases by 8-9 times. Trying to figure out what is happening.
  • Other results seem to be ok with the Walker vcmax.

Ian: there could be some connection with the climate variables or other parts of the code that need to be brought in with the Walker vcmax calculations.
Juergen: worth checking the respiration and vcmax temperature response.
Alex: worth looking at tweaking the sla parameter to see the effect on the leaf respiration while still looking to explain what is happening.

Ian: from Jhan, it will not be easy to get vcmax out of ESM1.6. It won’t be easier in AM3.

Australian PFTs

  • 2/12 and 4/13 swap is not collapsing GPP anymore, caused by using an old parameter file.

  • Jhan chasing down reproducibility. There may be MOSES parameters being used and making progress when parameters are made to agree

  • Alex sent list of parameters for input.

  • Rachel to review the veg. distribution with Aust PFTs and without to see if we want to set a min. fraction that is not worth simulating, as we have done in the past.

    • Before we used a 10% fraction threshold: a grid cell never reached more than 10% of that type with land use change. Alex: what was done with these 10% then? Rachel: it was distributed proportionally to other PFTs in the grid cell.
    • Rachel: issue with 10% on the coast lines though.
    • Alex: should we reduce the threshold instead of no threshold at all? Something like 1-3%.
  • Ian: Are the new PFTs evergreen:

    • Rachel: yes, the code assumes everything is evergreen unless there is something in the phenology file. It’s the simplest for now to keep them evergreen.
    • Alex: we need a water response for both.

June 26th 2025
(Tilo, Alex, Lachlan at AMOS)

For discussion

  • Revised pft distribution

Notes

PFT parameters for Australian trees

  • Ian looked into the physical parameters but most important will be the bgc ones. (@inh599 edit: and biophysical trait parameters such as stomatal function)
  • @RachelLaw, lots of parameters are also completely unused, it would be best to get rid of them completely.

Swapping PFTs

  • 2 runs,JuneSpinupStandard and JuneSpinupJuggle, should use the same except for the restart files. They still diverge very quickly. Nothing is looking crazy but it is different.
  • Question on what happens on the first UM radiation time step.

LUH3.1.1 data

  • Loss of temporal resolution in recent years. Decision from LUH data providers.
  • EGBL appearing in northern Russia: probably a bug to check
  • Tile fraction not quite summing to 1 at each time step. Problems in some Canadian tiles.
  • Changes between 3.1.1 and 3.0 for 1850:
    • Switch of EGNL to DNL in high latitudes. Also change noted in Tibetan plateau.
    • Reduced bareground, increase C4 grass in Australia
    • Decrease in trees and increase in grass in Europe.
  • Change between present day and 1850:
    • largest differences in DBL, more change from grass to crop
    • Australia’s change in trees is small.
  • @RachelLaw and @alexnorton to finish up. Pretty close to being ready to use.

AM3-BGC

  • reconfiguration not working for tiled CNP variables.
  • @inh599 , see how it is done for other tiled variables.
  • @lachlanswhyborn , to redo the restart with the correct values to bypass the reconf.
  • @inh599 , we will want the reconfiguration to work to enable seamless changes in resolution and input data.

Location of script for restart manipulations

July 3rd

Apologies: Jhan

For discussion

  • Vegetation distribution:

    • Rachel: Need to finalise this soon.
  • Seasonality of NEE

    • Lower than for ESM1.5 especially in mid- to northern latitudes. Not what we want to see
    • In 4xCO2, increases GPP a lot but not so much for NEE.
    • Rachel to look at seasonality of tundra.
    • Worth looking at parameters that drive GPP but there is a risk we then push up GPP beyond the realistic range.
    • Mathias has done some work on this. It is worth contacting him. According to this work, we need a high GPP and a high sensitivity to increase CO2.
    • Will look at the 1pctCO2 run as well.
  • Australian PFTs parametrisation

    • Meeting in 2 weeks for an update with Laura and Belinda.
    • Still some uncertainty on what is being run and what to compare to what.
  • Hourly radiation run

    • Hourly radiation test looks really good in land energy balance
    • But something weird happening in the top of the atmosphere (TOA) for the outgoing shortwave.
    • With OneAPI and the slowdown of the ocean, it’s possible this change might not impact the walltime of the configuration.
    • It is worth starting a parallel spinup run with this configuration.

Notes

July 10th

Apologies: Rachel

Chair: Alex
In Attendance: Alex, Ian, Claire, Lachlan, Jhan, Tilo, Juergen, Ben

For discussion

Notes

Historical Land-Use Change:

  • Alex benchmarked the LUH3.1.1 derived ACCESS PFT maps against the HYBMAP land cover map (2001-2020). Showed significant overestimation of forest/tree PFT area in high latitude regions. Many tundra PFT regions were replaced by tree PFTs (EGNL, DNL), while HYBMAP shows these areas as shrub/grass. Fix: Include tundra in the ‘forest’ LUH3 category so its 1850 distribution is largely retained.
  • Still need to finalise this historical land-use change map: Assign minimum fraction threshold and redistribute PFT fractions below this limit, add future potential PFTs with 1e-6 fraction.

Northern land seasonal amplitude underestimation bias:

  • Seasonal amplitude issue: Ben flagged that northern ecosystems need temperature sensitive phenology, which is still missing in CABLE. This could go a long way to resolving seasonal amplitude issue and incorporate a trend in GPP. Ian noted that Vanessa had developed a climate-sensitive phenology module which we should try to integrate in CABLE4.

ILAMB:

  • Ian is looking at ILAMB again. Comparisons with ILAMB benchmarks also show underestimation of global seasonal amplitude (GPP and NEE). Modeled albedo also looks like it is overestimated in mid-year at global average. Still working on getting the settings functional to look at specified regions.

Benchmarking ACCESS-ESM1.6 with CABLE:

  • Lachlan is testing an ACCESS-ESM1.6 build with CABLE compiled into a static library from the CABLE repository directly. This should give the same results as the release version of ACCESS-ESM1.6, which has the CABLE code included as source in the UM7 code (i.e. the files just copied into UM directory). This is a benchmarking test with the access-esm1.6-configs. It is not giving bit-wise equivalent results yet. He is running more tests, double checking flags and making more settings explicit.

Interactive phenology:

  • CABLE does have a simple interactive phenology module. This is independent of more advance capability such as POP, SLI etc. and sits in MAIN - see cable_phenology.F90
  • To activate this capability would require some addtional work - notably
  1. 4 additional variables added to the UM-restart (for %chilldays, %gdd5, %dtemp and %dmoist) and threaded through to CABLE (implicit) for use.
  2. cable_phenology to be refactored so as to not depend on CABLE-offline structures such as the patch% TYPE. cable_phenology has been modified recently as part of the attempt to insert Australian PFTs (i.e. hard-wired indices should be no issue).
  3. creation of a much-simplified version of cable_climate that calculates only the relevant information
  4. calls to cable_climate and cable_phenology inserted in the relevant places in the time stepping (cbm from cable_implicit) and/or the namelist phenology setting changed.

July 17th

For discussion

  • Vegetation distribution from LUH3-1-1. Readiness for testing? Need a restart.
  • Impact of attempts to make EGNL more productive
  • CABLE as a library update

Notes

Vegetation distribution from LUH3-1-1

  • need to adjust the restart to the changed tiles.
  • Rachel looked at the min. threshold we want for tile fraction. 0.01 looks like a decent threshold. Need to bump up tile fraction to 1e-6 (or 1e-4?) for tiles that will become used.
  • Alex to try Lachlan’s tool to create the restart starting from a restart from the June spinup.
  • Need to try the AMIP run with land-use change with this new veg. distribution.

EGNL productivity

  • Rachel sharing results. Sudden drop in productivity, LAI and NPP after about 10 years of simulation. First guess is to look at what is happening in the nitrogen cycle. Supported by the increase in labile carbon.
  • Rachel to look at all the pools information.
  • A step change in the drivers (at the start of the run) can also cause this.
  • Is the spike in leaf respiration realistic since productivity in going down? It could be happening because there is a step to calculate vcmax that doesn’t know about the nutrient limitation that would lead to a higher vcmax and higher respiration.

CABLE library

  • Identical results with a library or not with a compilation without optimisation. Optimisation
  • Need to confirm results with optimisation are acceptable: GPP, NBP in AMIP and PI-control
  • New testing system coming together as well

ILAMB results

  • Not a lot of results given by ILAMB for overall score. More info available for individual scores. Don’t have the spatial maps either.
  • GPP: phasing of the annual cycle is ok but not the amplitude.
  • Albedo: not getting a dip in albedo in the southern hemisphere. Annual cycle in the boreal regions is not quite correct.
  • CMIP6 results
  • Add the ESM1.5 results to the comparison. Ian tried but not that easy.
  • Can be useful for a systematic evaluation of AMIP configurations.

July 24th

For discussion

  • Australian pft parameters - Alex’s summary slides
  • CABLE as a library
  • EGNL productivity / nutrient limitation

Notes

CABLE as a library: Removing the optimisations didn’t work in fact. But checked that the CABLE code from the library branch gives the same answers as before if compiled inline. It definitely has to do with the compilation.

Australian PFT parameters:

  • Mallee more suited to Xeric. Should change before testing.
  • Should we use a precipitation-based threshold to define the separation between Mesic and Xeric? Should tall Eucalypts be EGBL or Mesic?
    • Right now, just need to implement what we already have and test that. Alternatives could be explored in a research project later on.
  • Leaf N:C and N:P given by Laura, based on 10th-90th percentiles, show a very large range compared to what is used in CABLE. Ask Laura for the ranges for 25th-75th percentiles.

EGNL productivity / nutrient limitation:

  • Still seeing issues with 1pctCO2 run.
  • Can’t reproduce the same behaviour in productivity with offline.
  • Need to check nitrogen deposition. Units?
  • This paper shows CABLE-POP (v11 or 12) show very high veg. C:N ratio in northern high latitudes compared to other models. But CABLE-POP dynamic could be different from CABLE3 because of some parameters and other code changes that aren’t reconciled.

Data request:

  • What time averaging to choose?
  • Pools are useful as instantaneous variables to check for carbon conservation, but we should only have monthly mean values for production runs. We still have the carbon conservation script.
  • Need to check the calculations of some variables. Information from Chloe for CMIP6.
  • Missing a couple of variables because it wasn’t certain how to get them.

July 31st

For discussion

  • CABLE as a library
  • Australian pfts
  • EGNL productivity / nutrient limitation
  • Progress on data request

Notes

CABLE as a library

  • May not make it in the spinup version.

Vegetation distribution and Australian PFTs

  • Historical land cover updated to remove tiles that always stay under 1%. 1e-6 is the min. start fraction for tiles that pop up later in the historical period.

  • Question about the future scenarios and what happens for new tiles? Not aiming for consistency, we would adapt the restart files, initialising the new tiles.

  • Jhan to give Alex the PFT parameters file in new format.

  • Going in 2 steps:

    • change the distribution without the Aus. PFT params
    • change the parameters for the Aus PFTs.
  • Tilo to send to Alex info on how the land-use change was done in ESM1.5 to prepare for ESM1.6

  • Need to review parameters for C4 crops. Some of the parameters in pftlookup file don’t look good.

  • The root distribution/depth parameter needs some sensitivity tests. Running with the same root distribution for all PFTs and only changing the max. root depth (only in Haverd2013).

  • g1 parameter: Laura gave information to Alex during the week.

  • Documentation on the provenance of the parameters for the Aus. PFTs: Alex keeping a document updated. There will be a model description paper but the Australia PFTs might need something separate.

  • Parameter file versioning: vk83 provides versioning. We can keep information in the CABLE documentation on the differences between these various versions. This will not work for non-Gadi users of CABLE, we will look into this when we provide supported configurations.

  • PFT 12/13: seems there is something wrong somewhere. Jhan followed this to an uninitialised factor in the convection, looking in UM code history to find a fix.

EGNL productivity / nutrient limitation

  • Test with nitrogen deposition / 365 in CABLE offline: broke the relation gpp - npp = autoresp. Probably coming from hitting the case where NPP < 0.
  • Is ACCESS more sensitive to low nitrogen than offline?

Data request

  • Progress made by Rachel and Ian. Haven’t found any requests that would require changes in the code.
  • Some changes might be required in MOPPeR. Some outputs might be better picked up from the tiles variables rather than the UM variables.

AM3

  • Jhan can’t find any CABLE fields in the output. Might be missing the STASH request.
  • Grid-cell outputs should be getting out. Other variables (like tiled soil) might need extra work.
  • Need to check the outputs from AM3 for the release. It seems to be outputting more than we need.
  • Do we want to harmonise the standard diagnostics for config releases? Spencer has done some work to have light, medium and heavy diagnostics requests. But being revisited with CMIP7 data request. We may want to use this work when it’s ready.

AMIP

  • Need a new test with the current spinup before moving to the CICE5 version.

August 7th

For discussion

  • Australian pfts - testing ‘sprint’, experiment design
  • Other ‘final’ CABLE changes

Notes

Australian PFTs

  • Rachel found another hard-wired number in CASA that assumes trees are the first PFTs. Looks easy to fix. It is in the thinning code. Other impact in distribution of wood to litter, reset to 0 for the trees but won’t find the 12/13 PFTs as trees. We could use another variable here to fix this. Issue is open, might be easier for Jhan to test.

    • Test with no impact: best to use the ESM1.5 distribution so we can turn on land-use change.
  • Ian has a problem with the fix to the convection, unsure if this has been changed yet.

  • Jhan ran 1 year with new veg distribution from Alex. Seems to have run fine.

  • Tests in AMIP runs until the PI-control has the CICE and ocean grid changes.

  • Need to ensure the phenology file is modified so PFT 13 changes from deciduous to evergreen.

EGNL low production

  • Lowering the limit to the leaf C:N ratio has an impact on the NPP, less reduction at the peak of the seasonal cycle in CABLE offline.

I have 5 year AMIP runs completed or underway for testing the Australian PFTs and land-use change.

All output is in /scratch/p66/rml599/access-esm/archive

Runs 1-4 use input files that have been modified to include pft 12 and 13 information with edits to config.yaml and cable.nml:
cable_vegfunc_N96.anc
pftlookup_cable3_1213_v1.csv
pft_params.nml
modis_phenology_csiro_nophase.txt

  1. Control run, starting from restart790 from JuneSpinUp run with date modified for amip run. No land use change.
    test-790orig-test-790orig-d0d4b96e
  2. Run with restart file from @alexnorton, /g/data/p66/ajn563/ACCESS-ESM/restart_luh3.astart adapted from restart790, further modified for amip start date. No land-use change.
    test-ANveg-test-ANveg-f98bdeea
  3. As 2 but with type 13 changed to evergreen via update to phenology file (modis_phenology_csiro_13evergreen.txt). No land use change.
    test-13evergreen-test-13evergreen-140c52e5
  4. As 2 but with land use change switched on. First attempt failed in script for updating vegetation distribution at the end of the year. Suspect differences in the dimension/variable names between @alexnorton’s new file and ESM1.5 file. Fudged file to match ESM1.5. Ran.
    test-luc-withbug-test-luc-withbug-219556e8
  5. As 4 but with updated parameters for c4crop (pft 10). Required updated pft_params.nml (mostly g1) and pftlookup_cable3_1213_v2.csv. No change to phenology file.
    test-c4crop-test-c4crop-b845de22
  6. As 2 but with froot values varied by pft (but no change to zr). New pft_params.nml copy of /g/data/p66/rml599/amip-test/pft_params.nml.altroot
    test-altroot-test-altroot-df6479a6
  7. As 4 but with executable as B i.e. with mlogmax removed.
    test-luc-newexe-test-luc-newexe-f655aa74

Runs A and B use original ESM1.5 vegetation distributions
A. Control run with land use change, no changes to dev-amip
orig-amip-orig-amip-9cb87380
B. Test run with new executable to remove ‘mlogmax’ and assumption that tree types always at start of pft ordering. Aim is to reproduce case 5. Appears to match exactly.
orig-amip-newexe-orig-amip-newexe-0718de83

August 14th

Rachel likely late due to an Aspendale seminar

For discussion

  • Latest ESM1.6 testing. AMIP tests described here with more planned for pft 12, 13 parameter testing.

Notes

Restart issue with Aus PFTs - carbon pools are zero for PFTs 12 and 13:

  • Need to double check Lachlan’s code to ensure the PFTs 12, 13 can use data from PFTs 2, 4. There is a setting in the config to do this:

Parameterisation tests for Aus PFTs:

  • Alex has a list of sensitivity tests to run in AMIP configuration with corresponding parameter input files ready.
  • How to benchmark these tests?
    • Put AMIP runs through ILAMB. Ian @inh599 to show Alex how to set this up.

Phosphorus limitation on Vcmax for Aus PFTs (12 and 13):

  • Do we want to implement this? Yes, likely need to apply P limitation given nutrient poor soils in Aus and that in ESM1.5 Australia had mostly EGBL (PFT 2) which already had P limitation.
  • We should test the P limitation switched on/off for PFTs 12 and 13. Requires code change in casa_feedback.f90.

August 21st
Apologies: Tilo, Juergen

For discussion

  • Results of first set of Australian pft sensitivity tests

Notes

PFT sensitivity tests

  • differences between experiments and control seem to fall within the climate variability.
  • Some open questions on how some of the parameters are used in the code to help setting these better.
  • Problem with the canopy height in the vegfunc file. Need to ask @lachlanswhyborn .
  • discussion on the veg. parameters:
    • it’s possible to remove a bunch of them without changing the results in ESM1.6 but these parameters could be needed for other applications.
    • removing vcmax from the namelist is changing the results even when using vcmax feedback, which we don’t understand why.
    • it would be nice to have a cleaner version when we release

Albedo test
Test to enforce albedo to be constant for the timestep is not working

Which input file are you using for the vegetation parameters? Is it still the one from the dev-preindustrial+concentrations configuration?

@lachlanswhyborn - we have been running amip runs based on dev-amip but with different parameter files, both pft_params.nml and pftlookup. What we need help with is the canopy height for the Australian pfts 12 and 13. This goes into the ‘vegfunc’ file as a constant at all grid-cells, and probably into the restart file as well. @alexnorton had a go at doing the vegfunc file but ran into problems. He has the values for the new canopy heights that we wanted to use.