Following up on from @helen’s recent email, I wanted to open up a conversation around how we might align modelling strategies at a national coastal scale with the proposed development of Coastal Modelling Commons and the Super-Regional MOM6 being suggested in the 25/26 ACCESS-NRI workplace.
At CSIRO, we have a set of mature national scale coastal unstructured grid models (using COMPAS) with coarse, intermediate and fine resolutions. These configurations are stable and and will be continually developed over the coming years. We will be progressively including rivers, sediment, carbon and BGC processes. We’d be happy to contribute them to the broader ACCESS-NRI effort—either as part of a downscaling pathway into the proposed super-regional MoM6 model or potentially directly within parent ACCESS-NRI models. We’d like to adopt open-development principals and would invite community members to participate in the development (code through to configurations), if this is of interest?
I’d be keen to start the conversation about how we might submit these configurations as a community contribution?
We see this as a valuable opportunity to build toward future collaborations and start realising further components of the ANCOMS vision in a “no regrets” manner.
I should also point out there are national scale SCHISM configurations and datasets … perhaps @VanessaHernaman you could comment on these configurations?
I’d be keen to hear thoughts from others on how we might best align coastal efforts—particularly in terms of domain boundaries, resolution strategies, and integration with the coastal commons.
Thanks for your suggestions – I think it is a good idea to work together to streamline approach for modelling higher-resolution scales. What resolution are the 3 COMPAS models (perhaps report mean and range in the resolution?)? I will describe mine in a post below (about to board a flight so this may be later today).
Aside from the regional domains, there are also plans to start developing an 8km global domain. So the global domains available will be 100 km, 25 km and 8km resolution (with BGC at the coarse resolutions) with the addition of the regional Aus-wide MOM6 domain at 4km. There is still a coverage gap at higher resolutions and I think that sharing some of the regional domains would be a great way to fill this gap (albeit with differing levels of support). We have shared a few MOM configurations at ACCESS-NRI so if we are keen, I can share some ideas on how we can share some community configuration in such a way to make it easier to collaborate across the community.
We are also developing a coastal commons github repository (likely we will put it here )and UNSW (@ckerry, @pcouto, @fsobral) are looking to upload scripts for model/data assessment. Initially the scripts will only work for ROMS but we are looking to make them code agnostic. I was thinking that a good first step for collaboration could be to or add some scripts that could use outputs from one model to force another model (e.g. some offline nesting between the different models). I would love to hear your (or anyone else’s) opinion on these ideas.
The regional MOM6 domain that I am developing is still early stages so there is room the adjust the domain size and coverage to better align with yours and other plans.
I am planning to initially develop a domain at 4 km resolution. I have a picture of the nominal domain below – but boundaries may need to move a bit for stability and run-performance. The idea is that we want to make the domain large enough to include remote tidally generated forcing, so it will include tides. This will make it harder to output at a useful frequency for downscaling. I have some ideas on how we can do this, but I think it may need to be a wider discussion.
The plan for this year is to run the domain for physics-only (inc tides). There are some MOM6 developments occurring at ACCESS-NRI, the wider Australian community and international collaborators (e.g. waves, WOMBAT BGC, Data assimilation). If there is interest and funding, we might be able to incorporate some of these in future versions of the configuration. However, we may need to also consider running a second coarser resolution model if we incorporate too much!
Was there a plan for the COMPAS configurations to include some of the EReefs functionality?
