An analysis of ENSO simulation biases in ACCESS-CM2 for CMIP6
Harun Rashid
1. Introduction
Global climate models show systematic errors in simulating El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO), the dominant mode of interannual variability. This is despite a substantial improvement in ENSO simulations by climate models over recent years. The simulated ENSO in ACCESS-CM2 has a period around 2.5 years, shorter than the observed periods of 3-7 years. Here, we investigate this ACCESS-CM2 bias, with the expectation that understanding this bias will improve ENSO simulation in subsequent versions of ACCESS.
-
Methodology
We use ACCESS-CM2 outputs from the CMIP6 archive and a set of 20 perturbed physics experiments and analyse these data with a statistical model based on the recharge-discharge oscillator model of ENSO. -
Results
Our analysis shows that ENSO periods in ACCESS-CM2 simulations are predominantly controlled by the strength of the thermocline feedback. A stronger thermocline feedback favours a shorter ENSO time scale and vice-versa. Consistent with having a shorter ENSO period, ACCESS-CM2 shows a stronger than observed thermocline feedback. The implications of this result will be discussed in the presentation. -
Audience
Researchers interested in climate variability, seasonal predictions, climate modelling, and users of the ACCESS model. -
Keywords
ACCESS, climate variability, seasonal predictions, climate modelling
Please use this thread for discussion about this talk.